Wolf News


In the Press: Utah worries about protections for Mexican wolves

By Brandon Loomis
Utah’s governor and wildlife chief are sounding the alarm about wolves on a second front, fearing the federal government is about to classify Mexican gray wolves for protection in the southern part of the state.

Gov. Gary Herbert and Division of Wildlife Resources Director Jim Karpowitz wrote to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Daniel Ashe, respectively, in late September, protesting what they say is the federal wildlife agency’s apparent plan to expand protections from Arizona and New Mexico into southern Utah and Colorado.

Herbert’s letter, obtained through an open-records request, asserts that Fish and Wildlife officials are telling the state they will reclassify the Mexican wolf as a subspecies — granting it full protections wherever it roams — and include Utah in its recovery zone. The governor disputes that the lobo’s range, mostly in northern Mexico, ever reached here. “¦

Utah officials and lawmakers have made clear that they want wolves kept out or minimized in an effort to protect livestock and big game.

The Fish and Wildlife Service, insisting it hasn’t yet chosen how to advance a recovery program, is sending its Southwest regional director to Salt Lake City for a meeting with Karpowitz on Thursday.

State officials’ nightmare scenario, Karpowitz said, is that Mexican wolves moving in from the south would trigger statewide protections even if the recovered Rocky Mountain gray wolves from the north have no Endangered Species Act safeguards.

A state wanting control over Rocky Mountain wolves could be thwarted by a look-alike protection clause in the law. Although generally smaller, Mexican wolves would be hard to distinguish from their northern cousins. “¦

Wendy Brown, Fish and Wildlife’s Southwest Region recovery coordinator, said the agency is considering options but has not yet issued a draft plan for public comment. Even if the plan ends up including Utah as potential Mexican wolf habitat, she said, there wouldn’t be any reintroduction without a separate public process.

In an Oct. 28 letter responding to Karpowitz, Ashe said his agency has not made any decisions about reclassifying the wolves. He wrote that Karpowitz had “mischaracterized the facts of the matter, the choices before us and their implications and also implied that the service has already decided how we intend to proceed.”

“We hope to move forward in a collaborative partnership with the Utah Department of Natural Resources and the other states,” Ashe wrote, “as we chart a path for management and recovery of this species.”

Mexican wolves were nearly extinct in the 1970s, when the U.S. began a captive-breeding program. In the early 1980s, the government established a goal of 100 wolves living in the wild in the Blue Mountains of New Mexico and Arizona, but there was no clear plan for recovery or thresholds for removal from the list of endangered species.

The agency now is working with interest groups and states to write that official recovery plan, and Utah’s participation in the process is what led state officials to assert that the Beehive State would be included.

A major concern for Karpowitz is the plan’s potential to reclassify Mexican wolves as a subspecies, giving them continuing protection regardless of whether the larger gray wolf population is deemed recovered. “¦

Wolf advocates say it isn’t so simple. Western wolf populations overlapped and interbred before settlers and the government largely eradicated them, said Kirk Robinson, executive director of the Salt Lake City-based Western Wildlife Conservancy.

“That’s part of their natural domain,” Robinson said of southern Utah, “whether it’s Mexican wolves or whatever subspecies can make it there.”

Brown said genetic samples from wolves killed in Utah, Colorado and Nebraska show similarities with Mexican wolves, indicating possible interbreeding.

Only 50 of the planned 100 wolves are now roaming the Southwest, though Eva Sargent, Defenders of Wildlife’s Southwest director, said recent collaborations with ranchers should help.

This article provides a brief window of opportunity to get letters published showing public support for wolves. The letters to the editor page is one of the most widely read parts of a newspaper and is viewed by decision-makers as a barometer of public opinion.

LETTER WRITING TIPS: This is your letter, so write what you think or feel about wolves and wolf management in your own words. However, here are a few suggestions for ensuring your message gets through clearly:
* Stress that Mexican gray wolves are necessary to restore the balance of nature.
* Ask your fellow citizens to speak up in support of Mexican gray wolves.
* Encourage public officials (by name) to support the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s actions to develop a new Recovery Plan based on the best available science.
* Include your connection with wolves and why the issue is important to you.
* Emphasize the benefits wolves provide ecologically and economically in places where they have been successfully reintroduced, like the Yellowstone region.
* Keep your letter under 200 words.
* Provide your name, address and phone number; your address and phone number will not be published with your letter, but they are usually required for confirmation in order to have your letter published.

Letters to the editor can be submitted to letters@sltrib.com (please, no attachments).

To read the full article and post a comment, click here.

Mexican gray wolf photo courtesy of Center for Biological Diversity, copyright Robin Silver


You are donating to : Lobos of the Southwest

How much would you like to donate?
$20 $50 $100
Name *
Last Name *
Email *
Additional Note